Congresswoman Carolyn Maloney D-N.Y. sees “threat” in the Constitution’s 2nd Amendment……………these Liberal Bastards Need to GO!

Congresswoman sees ‘threat’ in Constitution


But House sergeant-at-arms says gun expert’s
comment presented ‘no specific danger’

Bob Unruh

The head of a gun-rights organization is delivering a lesson on the Constitution to a member of Congress who claimed his statements on the Second Amendment constituted a threat against her.

“Allow me to explain the obvious,” Larry Pratt, executive director of Gun Owners of America, wrote in an open letter to Rep. Carolyn Maloney, D-N.Y.

“I have never encouraged, or even suggested, that anyone harm anyone. Rather, my speech was designed to educate citizens, and politicians, that it is the fact that Americans are armed that allows them to resist efforts to be dominated, intimidated, or controlled by politicians.”

His letter came after Maloney reported him to Capitol Police and the House Sergeant-at-Arms because of his statements in a recent interview with Rolling Stone.

In the interview, she alleged, “Mr. Pratt is actively encouraging his members to threaten violent action against members of Congress.”

Roll Call reported Maloney claimed Pratt’s statements were evidence of “just how outrageous the extreme pro-gun movement has become.”

The report said: “Maloney’s staff notified Capitol Police and House Sergeant-at-Arms Paul Irving of the recent article which declared Pratt the ‘Gun Lobby’s Secret Weapon,’ the congresswoman said, but they were told there was ‘no specific danger and nothing to be done.’”

Pratt told the congresswoman: “Lest you believe that I stand on the fringes of civilized society, let me provide you with some other sources for the same principle which I was enunciating.”

He cited the Declaration of Independence, which states “whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government.”

He quoted Frederick Douglass: “A man’s rights rest in three boxes: the ballot box, the jury box, and the cartridge box.”

Get Larry Pratt’s collection of columns and articles on gun control, in “On the Firing Line: Essays in the Defense of Liberty.”

And he called on the wisdom of John Basil Barnhill: “Where the people fear the government you have tyranny. Where the government fears the people you have liberty.”

Finally, he quoted Justice Antonin Scalia: “[W]hen the able-bodied men of a nation are trained in arms and organized, they are better able to resist tyranny.”

“These various statements span four centuries. They come from people of differing ethnicities, of various stations, and holding differing political beliefs,” Pratt wrote. “What they all agree on is that you should go to work every day with a healthy amount of fear and respect for the American people who you are supposed to represent.”

In Rolling Stone, Pratt had said, “The Second Amendment is not for hunting, it’s not even for self-defense.” Instead, it is “for restraining tyrannical tendencies in government. … Especially those in the liberal, tyrannical end of the spectrum. There is some restraint, and even if the voters of Brooklyn don’t hold them back, it may be there are other ways that their impulses are somewhat restrained. That’s the whole idea of the Second Amendment.”

The New York Daily News interpreted the statement to mean Pratt believes “the Second Amendment exists to ensure government officials face a permanent threat of gun violence.”

Not so, Pratt insisted.

Congress should do its job, he said, “in constant trepidation” over concern the members’ job performance would be “publicly criticized from the soap box … you will be voted out via the ballot box” or there would be a verdict in the jury box.

And, he wrote, “Should you attempt to disarm Americans the way the British crown tried 240 years ago, the same sovereign people who constituted this government using the cartridge box someday may need to reconstitute it, as clearly anticipated by the Declaration of Independence.”

A WND call requesting comment from Maloney’s office was not returned. But thousands of other Americans did jump into the conversation.

Examiner author David Codrea wrote that, like the famous “I’m Spartacus” scene from the Kubrick movie, on this issue he would say, “I’m Larry Pratt.”

“If the Capitol Police are going to investigate him, they’re going to have to investigate me, too, because I agree with everything he said about the Second Amendment being a last-resort protection against tyranny,” he wrote.

Thousands of Americans joined in with his statement on GOA’s Facebook page.

The basic constitutional concept also got an endorsement from GOP superstar Dr. Ben Carson, the retired neurosurgeon and author of multiple bestsellers.

According to, at a recent Western Conservative Summit in Colorado, Carson said the Second Amendment was installed in the Constitution so Americans could support the military if needed, but “more importantly, so that people could protect themselves from an overly aggressive government, if that ever happened.”

He said he “would never compromise the Second Amendment in any way.”

“All we have to do is look back through history and see what happened when various dictators rose to power,” he said. “One of the first things they always did was confiscate the weapons. So we don’t ever want to allow that situation to occur.

“We don’t even necessarily want them to know who has weapons.” he said.

Pratt told the congresswoman: “The Second Amendment was written to preserve ‘a free state’ against the ever present temptation faced by government officials to steal liberty from the people.”

And he re-told the story of Athens, Tennessee, in post-World War II 1946, when returning veterans “found their hometown …. had been taken over by corrupt local politicians.”

“It was those veterans’ access to and experience with firearms that made possible the preservation of ballot boxes that were about to be fraudulently counted, in what has come to be known as the Battle of Athens. A 1992 movie entitled ‘An American Story’ commemorates the actions of these brave veterans,” he wrote.

“Private ownership and skilled use of firearms is what enabled our country to gain its independence, and it is what continues to preserve our liberty. Someday, I hope that you study this aspect of the history of our great nation, that currently allows you to serve in the People’s House, and come to understand the great principles on which it was founded and continues to operate,” Pratt wrote.

Posted in 2nd Amendment | Leave a comment

John Kerry now #1 Example of “IGNORANT ASSHOLE”………..and he worked hard for that #1 rating folks!

Kerry to Mother of Fallen IDF Soldier: ‘How’s Your Day?’

John Kerry / AP

BY: Washington Free Beacon Staff

Taking a break in Jerusalem today from his attempt to broker a cease-fire between Hamas and Israel, Secretary of State John Kerry visited with the parents of Max Steinberg, a 24-year-old Los Angeles native and IDF soldier who was killed in action in Gaza. 

According to the Los Angeles Jewish Journal, “Kerry entered and exited the room swiftly, surrounded by men in black and refusing to take any questions from press.”

“How’s your day?” Kerry asked as he sat down. “How’s your day?” Evie [Steinberg's mother] asked back. “My day’s going better than yours,” he said.

This entry was posted in National Security and tagged John Kerry. Bookmark the permalink.

Posted in For YOUR consideration | Leave a comment

U.N. Taking Control of America’s Southern Border????? BLUE Helmets should be SHOT ON SIGHT!!!!!

Border Patrol Agents: U.N. Taking Control of America’s Southern Border

Under the pretense of labeling illegals “refugees,” U.N. personnel are working with DHS to ship MS-13 gang members into U.S., says agent

by Kit Daniels | | July 23, 2014


Two anonymous Border Patrol agents reportedly told radio host Dave Hodges that under the pretense of labeling illegal aliens “refugees,” the United Nations is “calling the shots” on America’s border operations and the U.N. is deciding which immigrants to ship to various parts of the U.S.

One of the agents said U.N. personnel are already present at various detention facilities in the American Southwest, according to Hodges, and are working with Homeland Security agents in “gathering MS-13 gangsters, captured from different roundups, patch worked together as a group and then shipped together to various locations on the perimeter of the United States.”

“I objected to admitting MS-13 gangsters into the U.S. and I was told that we have our orders to treat them like anyone else,” the other agent told Hodges.

Hodges says that he asked one of the agents how they knew the immigrants were MS-13 and he told him they could tell “by the tattoos.”

“He recounted the fact that MS-13 operatives will have a tattoo with tears on their face which represents a person that they have murdered in the commission of their drug related duties,” Hodges reported. “He said he processed an MS-13 member who had nine tears on his face and he was told to process him as an ‘unaccompanied juvenile refugee.’”

And police officers are already encountering these gang members, such as the La Grulla, Texas, officer who pulled over a vehicle last week carrying an aggressive MS-13 member.

“Once I asked him to lift up his shirt, that’s where I observed he had MS-13 tattooed on his chest and his back,” the officer stated. “Those are really dangerous subjects.”

The U.N., however, has already announced its intent to broadly designate illegal aliens, including MS-13 members from Central America, as “refugees.”

“Representatives of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, or UNHRC, are ‘intensely discussing in meetings’ the possibility of extending U.N. protection to the thousands of Central Americans crossing the U.S. border with Mexico illegally by defining them as ‘refugees’ who are seeking asylum from political and domestic violence in their home nations,” Jerome Corsi reported on July 14 for World Net Daily.

An informed source also told Infowars the U.N. is already calling illegals “refugees” and pro-amnesty organizations are likewise doing so even though Latin America has experienced extreme violence for the past 10 years and the massive influx of illegals has only occurred in the past few months.

In June, for example, several activists who were guests on NPR described all the illegal immigrant youth entering the U.S. in record numbers as desperate “war refugees” who need the full support of the government.

Of course, that’s obviously not the case if the U.N. is helping to import MS-13 gang members into the U.S., but U.N. representatives will still call them “refugees” if it allows the globalist organization to infringe upon America’s national sovereignty.

TCC: Ammo Up America….the U.N. has no business on American soil and their presence should be considered an INVASION and an ACT OF WAR!

Posted in Politically INCORRECT | Leave a comment

There are no More “Good” Democrats…………….sorry but it’s true

Democrat to La Raza: Punish Amnesty Opponents

Posted on by Tad Cronn

It probably should be no surprise that an elected government official from the Democratic Party would be opposed to the safety and security of the United States, yet somehow.Illinois Rep. Louis Gutierrez still manages to shock.

In a less docile and arguably more civilized time, Gutierrez would have been dipped in tar and run out of town on a rail. But today’s Democatic Party being what it is, he’s applauded, even when he speaks to a conference hosted by the seditionist La Raza movement and calls for Latinos to “punish” people who oppose amnesty, meaning mostly Republicans.

According to Gutierrez, President Obama gave illegal aliens a “down payment” by slowing down deportations. “We need to raise our voices, make ourselves citizens, sign up to vote and punish those who speak ill and criminalize children who come to our border,” Gutierrez said.

It’s a hell of a thing to say in front of people representing a movement that has as its stated purpose the “Reconquista” or stealing of the Western United States, under the delusion that it somehow belongs to Mexico. (In fact, Mexico sold the land to the United States after the Mexican-American War.)

But then, the pro-amnesty crowd has never been known for its loyalty to the United States, or even a modicum of tact.

While Gutierrez was out cheering on the treason train, other amnesty supporters from United We Dream were storming the Senate offices, carrying a makeshift coffin painted with the words “RIP GOP” and shouting, “We shall overcome.”

Coming on the heels of nationwide protests against illegal immigration that were barely covered by any media, pro-amnesty rallies are simply going to ramp up the righteous anger in this country.

According to Gutierrez, President Obama promised in a meeting with the Congressional Hispanic Caucus that he would be “generous” in working to stop deportations.

Gutierrez may be a weasel, but what he said about Obama rings true because the president’s already been doing it. By illegally enacting through executive orders the congressionally rejected DREAM Act and using “prosecutorial discretion” to release illegal aliens who should be jailed and facing deportation, Obama has whipped up a feeding frenzy.

Thanks to his actions, the drug cartels know exactly where the weakness in our immigration laws is, and accordingly they have been shipping unaccompanied children across the border, only stopping short of physically throwing them across.

Obama’s response to the flood of human tragedy he has brought on us has been nothing short of insanely stupid, shipping aliens across the country and releasing them to bring the burdens of untreated illnesses and often violent criminal pasts to unsuspecting communities.

There have now been reports that the White House was forewarned more than a year ago of the brewing crisis coming due to Obama’s policies, yet here we are facing a potential health crisis and a crime outbreak that could have been avoided completely.

Sickened by Obama’s limp response to the immigration crisis, Texas Gov. Rick Perry has now promised to send up to 1,000 National Guard troops to the border to back up Texas human service agents and to face off if necessary against the drug cartels.

If someone doesn’t get shot soon because of this mess, it will be a minor miracle.

Obama has failed to enforce the laws of this country, violated his oath of office, shredded the Constitution and aided our enemies, from South America to Iraq. Why isn’t this man in jail, America?

Posted in Immigration | Leave a comment

(un) True Blood: What OBAMA has done to Lady Liberty and the U.S.A.



Posted in Hit & Run | Leave a comment

The “Obama Channel” To Become BIG BROTHER

The Obama Channel to Become Big Brother

I SEE you and KNOW what you've done!

I SEE you and KNOW what you’ve done!


Posted on by Dave Jolly

I hope you’ve either read or seen the move 1984. Published by George Orwell in 1949:

“The novel is set in Airstrip One (formerly known as Great Britain), a province of the superstate Oceania in a world of perpetual war, omnipresent government surveillance, and public manipulation, dictated by a political system euphemistically named English Socialism (or Ingsoc in the government’s invented language, Newspeak) under the control of a privileged Inner Party elite that persecutes all individualism and independent thinking as ‘thoughtcrimes’. The tyranny is epitomized by Big Brother, the quasi-divine Party leader who enjoys an intense cult of personality, but who may not even exist. Big Brother and the Party justify their oppressive rule in the name of a supposed greater good.”

Doesn’t that sound very much like Barack Obama and his administration, except that Obama is very much real? Only we need to prepare to see the face of Obama instead of the face of Big Brother when you turn on your television. It won’t matter which station you turn to or whether you have cable or satellite television.

The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) is preparing to change the Emergency Broad System (EBS) to allow the president to address the entire nation in case of any supposed emergency. Currently, you get the annoying EBS tests or the warning of tornadoes or other pending serious weather conditions. But under the proposed FCC overhaul, Obama would be free to cut in on every channel in the US whenever he wishes to contrive some sort of emergency.

Currently, it would be impossible for Obama to reach the entire nation because every local provider has their own emergency signal to broadcast on. For the proposed system to work, the FCC is considering creating a national location code that would allow Obama to override every broadcast nationwide over the EBS at just the flip of a switch.

Supposedly, this change is designed to save lives in the case of national emergencies, but is that just a ruse to get the national location code in place? Consider that a couple years ago, Obama signed an executive order that gave him complete and absolute control over all forms of communication under any circumstance. The executive order is titled Assignment of National Security and Emergency Preparedness Communications Functions. Chances are that Obama didn’t want to bring attention to this action because of the power it places in his grasp.

Section 1 of the executive order reads:

“The Federal Government must have the ability to communicate at all times and under all circumstances to carry out its most critical and time sensitive missions. Survivable, resilient, enduring, and effective communications, both domestic and international, are essential to enable the executive branch to communicate within itself and with: the legislative and judicial branches; State, local, territorial, and tribal governments; private sector entities; and the public, allies, and other nations. Such communications must be possible under all circumstances to ensure national security, effectively manage emergencies, and improve national resilience. The views of all levels of government, the private and nonprofit sectors, and the public must inform the development of national security and emergency preparedness (NS/EP) communications policies, programs, and capabilities.” [Emphasis mine]

With this executive order and now the FCC creation of the national location code, Obama will be authorized to interrupt all cable, satellite and television programming at any time for any purpose and all circumstances. I like what former Col. and US Rep. Allen West said about the new FCC changes:

“So why does the president need a special code which will give him the immediate ability to ‘address’ the American people? And who in the president’s administration will determine what is an emergency?”

“Let me see if I understand this correctly. The president can just flip a switch and all TV channels go to him speaking? And what is the intent? Is it to tell Americans we’re dispersing illegal immigrants all across the country? Is the purpose to allow the president to issue whatever ideological propaganda message he desires?…”

“I always love how we mask nefarious intents under the guise of helping, warning, protecting, and preparing the American people. We have 24-hour news and weather channels that inform the American people. And a terrorist attack? Here we go with fear-mongering in order to expand government control. Didn’t we just hear the same about the NSA surveillance program of Americans?”

“And once again, something is being added to the Federal Registry under the ever-expanding bureaucratic regulatory state — and not by legislative process. So much for protecting, warning and informing the American people…”

“The last thing anyone in America should want is a president with the ability to flip a switch and broadcast directly into your home.”

Orwell’s fictional novel is looking more and more like a prediction that is coming true. Big Brother will be replaced by Big Obama and he will soon be able to control what everyone watches in the privacy of their own home. He will be able to broadcast his propaganda into every household with a television and computer.

Posted in Keep the "Change" | Leave a comment

Boehner: House Has no Plans to Defund UNCONSTITUTIONAL Acts by Obama…..then FUC* YOU TOO BOEHNER!

Boehner: House Has No Plans to Defund Unconstitutional Acts by Obama

July 17, 2014 – 3:37 PM

By Brittany M. Hughes






Boehner & Obama, Just ONE IN THE SAME!

( - House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) indicated today that if President Barack Obama takes actions that exceed his constitutional authority, the House of Representatives has no plans to use its own constitutional authority to withhold funding from those actions.

At his weekly press briefing, asked Boehner: “You’ve said you disagree with calls to impeach the president over abuse of power via executive actions. But under the Constitution the House actually has the power of the purse. So, if the President takes actions that exceed his Constitutional authority, will you withhold funding for those actions in the next must-pass appropriations bill?

“There’s a lot of ways to deal with this issue,” Boehner responded. “But we’ve got a Republican House and we’ve got a Democratic Senate. And there are a lot of things we’ve passed here that the Senate clearly has not passed.

“Now, when it comes to that issue, some of these actions that you could defund, there clearly isn’t, I wouldn’t guess, an appetite in the United States Senate to withhold those funds,” Boehner continued. “That’s why we’ve decided that the more direct approach of suing the president is the right path to go down here.

“Listen, I’m for upholding the Constitution,” said Boehner, “and I’m for protecting the interest of the House vis-à-vis the power grab that’s going on by the White House. And while he has the authority to issue executive orders, he does not have the authority to unilaterally change laws in our country, which he has done.”

Article 1, Section 9, Clause 7 of the U.S. Constitution says: “No Money shall be drawn from the Treasury, but in Consequence of Appropriations made by Law; and a regular Statement and Account of the Receipts and Expenditures of all public Money shall be published from time to time.”

Federal spending laws regularly include language prohibiting the Executive Branch from using funds for certain purposes.

Appropriations bills must be passed by both the House and Senate and be signed by the president—or overcome his veto—before they become law. This means that the House has the constitutional authority to pass a bill that withholds funding for executive actions, including those they believe exceed the president’s constitutional authority.

The Senate can refuse to pass, or the president can refuse to sign, a bill passed by the House that prohibits funding for Executive actions the House deems unconstitutional or outside the scope of the Executive’s legal authority, but unless the House relents and agrees to fund that activity, the Executive cannot engage in it.

At the end of the last fiscal year, the Republican-controlled House initially passed a continuing resolution to fund the government that denied funding for implementation of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. The Senate refused to pass a CR with that language, and President Obama refused to accept one. After 16 days, the House backed down and passed a CR that permitted implementation of Obamacare.

Boehner announced this June that the House now plans to sue President Obama for taking unilateral actions that exceed his legal authority, saying at the time that abuse of power affords Obama “king-like authority at the expense of the American people and their elected legislators.”

“On matters ranging from health care and energy to foreign policy and education, President Obama has repeatedly run an end-around,” Boehner said, adding the President has a habit of “ignoring some statutes completely, selectively enforcing others and at times, creating laws of his own.”

When he was asked earlier this month if he agrees with calls by some Republicans to impeach President Obama for executive overreach, Boehner simply answered, “I disagree.”

.45imagesTCC: THIS shows that the Republican and the Left are ONE IN TH SAME and BOTH need to GO! Obama is a TRAITOR and BOEHNER (The Pussy ) is a Traitorous Enabler!

Posted in For YOUR consideration | Leave a comment

Can’t understand why no one will hire him……..REALLY?????


Posted in Hit & Run | Leave a comment

11 Facts that Show We Live in a Country Run By Idiots


Posted by Godfather Politics

The following list has been attributed to comedian Jeff Foxworthy. Snopes says Foxworthy is not the author.

The original compiler is a man named Fritz Edmunds.

1. If you can get arrested for hunting or fishing without a license, but not for being in the country illegally, you live in a country run by idiots.

2. If you have to get your parents’ permission to go on a field trip or take an aspirin in school, but not to get an abortion, you live in a country run by idiots.

3. If you have to show identification to board an airplane, cash a check, buy liquor or check out a library book, but not to vote on who runs the government, you live in a country run by idiots.

4. If the government wants to ban stable, law-abiding citizens from owning gun magazines with more than ten rounds, but gives 20 F-16 fighter jets to the crazy leaders in Egypt, you live in a country run by idiots.

5. If, in the largest city, you can buy two 16-ounce sodas, but not a 24-ounce soda because 24-ounces of a sugary drink might make you fat, you live in a country run by idiots.

6. If an 80-year-old woman can be stripped searched by the TSA but a woman in a hijab is only subject to having her neck and head searched, you live in a country run by idiots.

7. If your government believes that the best way to eradicate trillions of dollars of debt is to spend trillions more, you live in a country run by idiots.

8. If a seven year old boy can be thrown out of grade school for saying his teacher’s “cute,” but hosting a sexual exploration or diversity class in grade school is perfectly acceptable, you live in a country run by idiots.

9. If hard work and success are met with higher taxes and more government intrusion, while not working is rewarded with EBT cards, WIC checks, Medicaid, subsidized housing and free cell phones, you live in a country run by idiots.

10. If the government’s plan for getting people back to work is to incentivize NOT working, with 99 weeks of unemployment checks and no requirement to prove they applied but can’t find work, you live in a country run by idiots.

11. If being stripped of the ability to defend yourself makes you more “safe” according to the government, you live in a country run by idiots.

If you are offended by this article,  you probably voted for the idiots who are running our country into the ground.

The following video expands upon the above:


Posted in Politically INCORRECT | Leave a comment

Obama Administration : Transparent”????? Yeah…….Right!








Only if you “Sheep” use these:


Posted in Hit & Run | Leave a comment