Describes president’s amnesty plan as modern-day ‘Fort Sumter’
By Paul Bremmer
President Obama’s looming executive action on immigration reform represents a Fort Sumter-type moment, according to conservative icon Phyllis Schlafly.
Schlafly at first considered comparing the Obama amnesty to the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor but decided that Obama’s plan is much more subtle.
“With Pearl Harbor, the American people knew what was happening,” she said.
But Fort Sumter, where the opening shots of the Civil War were fired, represented the beginning of a ruinous conflict, and Schlafly, like fellow conservative luminary Richard Viguerie, speculates that an executive amnesty might touch off a sort of modern-day conflagration.
Obama plans to announce his unilateral immigration reform proposal in a televised address Thursday night. While no details are being released by the White House until then, analysts widely expect it to include delaying deportation and issuing work permits to up to 5 million people currently in the U.S. illegally.
However, it could be just the beginning. Last month, the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services began searching for a contractor capable of producing up to 34 million blank green cards over the next five years.
Obama’s executive order is expected to include some parents of U.S. citizens and legal permanent residents. The Washington Post reported the plan will broaden visa programs for highly skilled technology workers.
Two components of the plan would seem to appease immigration-control advocates. At the National Press Club Wednesday, Secretary of Homeland Security Jeh Johnson claimed the president’s order would include steps to secure the southern border of the United States. And “an official familiar with the administration’s deliberations” told the New York Times the newly authorized illegal aliens would not be eligible for subsidized health insurance plans under Obamacare.
Schlafly, whose recently published book “Who Killed the American Family?” came out just days before she turned 90, is not at all reassured by the latter two parts of the plan.
Asked whether she trusts Obama to secure the nation’s southern border, she replied: “No. I don’t trust him.”
She pointed out that politicians have been promising to secure the border for years, but it remains wide open. She remembers when Obama’s predecessor failed to deliver on a promised border fence.
“I remember seeing George W. Bush’s photo-op,” Schlafly said. “He was signing the law to build the fence. And they never built it.”
She is also skeptical of the idea that beneficiaries of Obama’s amnesty will be barred from receiving health-care subsidies.
“No, I don’t think he will deny them Obamacare,” she said.
So is the president lying?
“I think he lies about everything,” Schlafly said.
Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2014/11/schlafly-obama-could-launch-another-civil-war/#EQ3dMP3w0wYwXjKf.99
A Nation of “SHEEP” breeds a Government of “WOLVES”
Those who believe that Jesus is God’s Son are accursed: “The Jews call ‘Uzair a son of Allah, and the Christians call Christ the son of Allah. That is a saying from their mouth; (in this) they but imitate what the unbelievers of old used to say. Allah’s curse be on them: how they are deluded away from the Truth! ” — Qur’an 9:30
Christians, as People of the Book, must be warred against and subjugated: “Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, nor hold that forbidden which hath been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger, nor acknowledge the religion of Truth, (even if they are) of the People of the Book, until they pay the Jizya with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.” — Qur’an 9:29
The cowards in Washington will/are selling out this Nation, but, We, The People are NOT going to let Islam dictate ANYTHING to us. There WILL be a reckoning and you will find it very difficult to walk with your Qur’an shoved up your ass.
Obamacare architect Jonathan Gruber said that lack of transparency was a major part of getting Obamacare passed because “the stupidity of the American voter” would have killed the law if more people knew what was in it. Gruber, the MIT professor who served as a technical consultant to the Obama administration during Obamacare’s design, also made clear during a panel quietly captured on video that the individual mandate, which was only upheld by the Supreme Court because it was a tax, was not actually a tax.
Read more at http://conservativevideos.com/obamacare-architect-passed-law-thanks-stupidity-american-voter/#MX07QHhfC68IpA0c.99
Loretta Lynch, a former US Attorney under President Bill Clinton and currently serving in that capacity under Barack Obama, has been tapped as the replacement for Attorney General Eric “We must brainwash people on guns” Holder.
The Wall Street Journal reported earlier this week:
President Barack Obama’s leading choice to be the next attorney general is Loretta Lynch, the top federal prosecutor in Brooklyn, N.Y., as the White House looks to tap someone who could pass muster with the new Republican-controlled Senate, according to people familiar with the discussions.
Ms. Lynch, who is known within the Justice Department as an aggressive prosecutor and has a good relationship with departing Attorney General Eric Holder, has moved to the pole position in recent weeks, these people said. Ms. Lynch’s stock rose during the selection process, particularly after her interview with the president, these people said.
An announcement isn’t likely until the president returns from a trip to Asia in mid-November, meaning a final decision on the nomination has yet to be made, these people said. The timing indicates the White House doesn’t plan to try and get a new attorney general confirmed during the lame duck session of Congress, while Democrats still control the U.S. Senate, these people said.
Today, the Washington Times confirmed that Obama has named her as Holder’s replacement, reporting:
President Obama on Saturday praised U.S. Attorney Loretta Lynch, whom he officially nominated to be the nation’s next Attorney General during a ceremony at the White House.
“It’s pretty hard to be more qualified for this job than Loretta,” Mr. Obama said. “She’s established herself as tough, fair…she has spent years in the trenches as a prosecutor.”
At that time, she was involved in the shakedown of Citigroup by the Justice Department to the tune of $7 billion in fines for allegedly helping to trigger the 2008 financial crisis.
At that time, Lynch said, “After collecting nearly 25 million documents relating to every residential mortgage-backed security issued or underwritten by Citigroup in 2006 and 2007, our teams found that the misconduct in Citigroup’s deals devastated the nation and the world’s economies, touching everyone.”
She failed to acknowledge federal government policies that “required banks to knowingly lend money to underqualified borrowers,” particularly nonwhite minorities, namely the Community Reinvestment Act.
Discover the Networks provides some additional history for Loretta Lynch:
From 1984-90, Lynch was a litigation associate for the New York-based firm of Cahill, Gordon & Reindel. From 1990-2001 she worked in various capacities for the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of New York. In 1999 President Bill Clinton appointed her as U.S. Attorney for that District, a position she held until 2001.
In 2000, Lynch was a member of the trial team in the highly publicized United States v. Volpe civil-rights case against a New York City police officer who had brutalized a black Haitian immigrant named Abner Louima. Also during her years in the U.S. Attorney’s office, Lynch was a frequent instructor in the Justice Department’s Criminal Trial Advocacy Program, and she worked as an adjunct professor at the St. John’s University School of Law during the fall 2000 semester.
From October 1994 to January 1998, Lynch was a partner with the Connecticut-based Ujamaa Investment Group. “Ujamaa” is a Swahili term signifying a commitment to the practice of “shared wealth” and a repudiation of economic inequality.
In 2002 Lynch began an eight-year stint as a partner with the New York law firm of Hogan & Hartson, where her practice focused on commercial litigation, white-collar criminal defense, and corporate compliance issues. From 2003-05 she served on the board of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York.
Lynch believes that the American criminal-justice system is filled with discrimination against nonwhite minorities. In August of 2014, Lynch wrote, “The department has made great progress in reforming America’s criminal justice system. Our focus is not just on the prosecution of crime, but on eradicating its root causes as well as providing support for those re-entering society after having paid their debt to it.”
So what is her solution of “eradicating” the “root cause” of crime? Is it the power of the gospel of Jesus Christ to change the wicked heart of the criminal? No. From Lynch’s perspective, an enforcement of critical race theory is what is needed. In case you have forgotten, critical race theory was developed by none other than Obama’s Harvard professor Derrick Bell. Harvard is also where Lynch graduated.
“There is, of course, much work still to be done,” she continued. “Currently our country imprisons approximately 2.2 million people, disproportionately people of color. This situation is a drain on both precious resources and human capital. The Attorney General is committed to reform of this aspect of our criminal justice system.”
Lynch has also advanced alternatives to incarceration for nonviolent offenders, as well as a restoration of voting rights for convicted felons who have served their prison sentences.
TCC: Really??? Accept an OBAMA nomination? ANYONE Obama nominates and ANYTHING Obama does is to further his anti-American Agenda. GOP if YOU don’t stop him, YOU are done, along with the Libs!
Read more at http://freedomoutpost.com/2014/11/former-clinton-us-attorney-loretta-lynch-tapped-next-attorney-general/#fhbYDgtCvb9W4DqS.99
“We the people of the United States, in order to perform more perfect Union, do establish justice of the United States, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.”
– Preamble to The United States Constitution
What if you woke up this morning, opened up the newspaper or turned on the TV to your local news channel and saw this:
“The Obama administration has been found criminal and corrupt. Impeachment will take place this week, and all administrative officials who have continuously broken the laws of our constitutional republic will be tried, convicted and brought to justice.”
Would you not be shocked? But why is that? It’s because American citizens have fallen so far from the Bible, the U.S. Constitution and, of course, what our forefathers established that we think justice is impossible.
I am reminded of the true story of William Wallace – most of you know him as “Braveheart.” William was told by the “Nobles” of Scotland that it was impossible to defeat the tyrannical king of England and his minions (which held Scotland in captivity to their tyrannical ways). They were too many (which is completely opposite of America’s state), too strong in every way for Scotland … or so they thought.
This one man, William Wallace, knew more than the “Nobles” of Scotland. He knew that freedom was not a gift granted to them by mere men or a tyrant king, but freedom was a right guaranteed to every man by God, which has been summed up in our Declaration of Independence.
Freedom was not a thing to be stripped away from the common people by a tyrant; Wallace knew that rights were granted by God.
The people of Scotland, outnumbered, outmatched, starving and without even the proper weapons to fight with, followed William Wallace, and eventually Robert the Bruce, into battle. Although it was a high cost to pay (namely, the life of William Wallace himself), they won their freedom and were delivered from the tyrannical king of England.
How could this be? How could the starving commoners defeat a skilled, well-trained, heavily armored army? It was because their freedom was more precious to them than anything in the world, and they would rather die than have it taken away. They were resolved and were willing to follow one man who believed they could secure it (1 Corinthians 11:1; Hebrews 12:2).
He hoped against all odds, believed God for the impossible – and look at the results!
Now take that to America. The “Nobles,” or shall we say most congressmen and women, will not stand up against the crimes that have befallen “we the people” at the hands of this administration. They have titles and positions they don’t want to lose, much like the “Nobles” of Scotland in the day.
But the tyrannical king of England was not defeated by the “Nobles.” He was defeated by the people.
Justice doesn’t need to be something we only dream about. Justice is brought forth to establish righteousness because you are grateful for your blood-bought freedoms (Isaiah 51:4).
America, it can be the reality we leave to our children, the way our forefathers left it unto us.
America, God is willing to give to His people what His people are willing to fight for (1 Timothy 6:12)! Yet, you have to be willing to fight (Psalm 78:9).
“Sad will be the day when the American people forget their traditions and their history, and no longer remember that the country they love, the institutions they cherish, and the freedom they hope to preserve, were born from the throes of armed resistance to tyranny, and nursed in the rugged arms of fearless men.”
– Roger Sherman, signer of the Declaration of Independence
In our pledge we state, “With Liberty and Justice for All.” It doesn’t say justice for all unless you are the president of United States or an attorney general, or the Congress, does it? The word “Justice” applies to all and means all! If America fails to bring forth justice, rest assured tyranny will reign.
Read more at http://patriotupdate.com/articles/bravehearts-left-america/