Manufactured Illegal “Crisis” a way to Activate Foreign Troops in America…….Treat them as the Invasion Force they are and shoot on sight!

Manufactured Illegal “Crisis” a Way to Activate Foreign Troops in America

Written on Tuesday, July 29, 2014 by Lorne Dey








There is now ample proof that the Obama administration has manufactured the so-called crisis at our southern border where perhaps as many as three million illegal aliens from Mexico, South America, China, the Middle East, and elsewhere have entered the United States just since January of 2014. Besides flooding our country with millions of welfare recipients designed to overwhelm and crash our system and gain more potential Democratic voters, the scheme is also designed to give more authority to and the general knowledge of foreign United Nations troops already here in our country.

With recent events where it has been reported that United Nations personnel are now on the border, the reason for this sudden influx of illegal aliens flooding into America aided by U.S. government agencies like the fraudulently conceived, Homeland Security, is becoming apparent – The “crisis” has been manufactured by Obama as a pretext to give foreign troops greater involvement on U.S. soil.

According to the Save America Foundation, as of 2013 it has been “estimated that anywhere between 200 to 400 thousand foreign troops have entered through U.S. borders.” The foreign troops from reportedly Russia, Poland, and other Slavic countries have been here for several years now training along side our own U.S. military forces under the guise of preparing to fight against international terrorism. If this is true, why haven’t any of these units gone after and taken out the 35 or more terrorist training camps that are already known to exist in compounds scattered around the United States? Because the real reason for these so-called anti-terrorist and multi-national training units is much more frightening and sinister!

It has been reported that Obama has been actively engaged in purging the U.S. military since 2011 and, according to a story in 2013 by World Net Daily, retired Army Maj. Gen. Patrick Brady states, “There is no doubt he [Obama] is intent on emasculating the military and will fire anyone who disagrees with him” over such issues as “homosexuals, women in foxholes, the Obama sequester,” Brady told WND.

But this writer and others believe the reasons are much more diabolical than simply compromising and emasculating the U.S. military – it is to get rid of anyone who Obama believes will hinder him or refuse to fire on U.S. Citizens during another manufactured “crisis” that he creates as a pretext to declare martial law. There is little doubt that his ace up the sleeve is to have foreign, United Nations troops who will have no trouble of conscience disarming or even shooting down dissident American citizens.

Anyone thinking that a narcissistic megalomaniac like Barack Obama is just going to quietly hand over the reigns of power in January of 2017 should think seriously about this man’s lack of regard for the laws of this country and the fact that he has gotten away with every un-Constitutional act he has ever done. He has already been acting like a king, so does any astute person really believe he’s not going to create something else in the next two years to feed to the leftist media and brainless masses as a reason that he must stay in power and preside over some new crisis that he has created?

Read the rest of this Patriot Update article here:

Posted in For YOUR consideration | Leave a comment

Obama Bottomfeeder thinks he “deserves” $15/hr.


Posted in Hit & Run | Leave a comment

Obama Thanks Muslims for “Building the Very Fabric of Our Nation”……what a Friggin A-Hole he is ( and I’m speaking to his 1/2 WHITE side )

Obama Thanks Muslims for ‘Building the Very Fabric of Our Nation’

July 28, 2014 – 4:40 PM

Its just a few Jets!

They’re my “Bro’s”

By Barbara Boland

Subscribe to Barbara Boland RSS

A statement put out today by President Barack Obama on the occasion of a religious holiday is raising some eyebrows.

The holiday is a Muslim one called “Eid-al-Fitr” and the statement says:

This last month has been a time of fasting, reflection, spiritual renewal, and service to the less fortunate. While Eid marks the completion of Ramadan, it also celebrates the common values that unite us in our humanity and reinforces the obligations that people of all faiths have to each other, especially those impacted by poverty, conflict, and disease.

In the United States, Eid also reminds us of the many achievements and contributions of Muslim Americans to building the very fabric of our nation and strengthening the core of our democracy. That is why we stand with people of all faiths, here at home and around the world, to protect and advance their rights to prosper, and we welcome their commitment to giving back to their communities.

The word choice here, that anyone built “the very fabric of our nation” would usually sound hackneyed and overplayed – but, in this particular instance, given that the U.S. didn’t even have its first Muslim-American congressman until 2007, the peculiar word choice has left some scratching their heads.

It’s not hard to see why 72% of Muslim-Americans approve of the President, though (the highest percentage out of any religious group.)

Posted in For YOUR consideration | Leave a comment

Obama’s Brother Joins Hamas?????? Gee, go figure!

Obama’s Brother Joins Hamas?

Posted by Dave Jolly

In case you’ve wondered why Barack Obama has abandoned Israel and seems to be siding with Hamas in the current conflict, wonder no more.

A year ago I wrote about Obama’s older half-brother Malik Obama:

“In addition to illegally operating the non-profit organization, Barack H. Obama Foundation, Malik Obama currently works as the Executive Secretary of the Islamic Da’wa Organization (IDO). The US State Department considers the government of Sudan to be a terrorist organization and it just so happens that the IDO was created by that same Sudanese government.”

“In 2010, the IDO held a conference in Khartoum, the capital of Sudan. The conference was led by Omar Al-Bashir, the President of Sudan. He is wanted on seven counts of crimes against humanity by the International Criminal Court. The US State Department has also listed Bashir as the head of the state sponsored terrorism of Sudan.”…

“Malik Obama not only attended the IDO conference, but he spoke at it as well. There are photos of Malik and his boss, Suar Al Dahab, Chairman of the IDO. Dahab has a close relationship with Bashir and has been seen with Yusuf Al-Qaradawi, the spiritual leader of the Muslim Brotherhood who says Hitler did not finish the job in exterminating the Jews, and Ismail Haniyeh, the Prime Minister of Hamas (a terrorist organization). On a recent trip to Gaza, the three men appeared together and it was obvious that Dahab demonstrated full support to the two leaders.”

“With Malik’s obvious ties to Islamic terrorism, I can’t help but wonder just how close the two half-brothers are. According to reports, they each stood as best man at the other’s wedding, although I’m not sure which wedding of Malik’s it’s referring to since he supposedly has 13 wives. Malik has also visited the White House on a number of occasions.”

At that time, I questioned the loyalty of Barack Obama to America and our ally Israel.

Now, former Muslim extremist Walid Shoebat and his colleague Ben Barrack report that Malik Obama also attended the 2010 Orphans Development Fund (ODF) Conference in which he wore a Hamas scarf that bore the Palestinian inscriptions:

“Jerusalem is ours – WE ARE COMING”

The scarf also contained a map of Palestine with the inscription:

“From the River to the Sea!”

This is a common Palestinian statement meaning that there is no Israel and Malik has worn it at more than one public event so it isn’t just a one-time fluke. Shoebat says there can be no doubt that Malik Obama has definitely sided with Hamas and shares their vow to wipe Israel off the face of the earth.

Malik is not just a distant half-brother of Barack Obama. He was the best man at Barack and Michelle’s wedding and has been a frequent visitor to the White House. When asked about being Barack’s half-brother in an interview for GQ Magazine, Malik took offense:

“‘Everyone’s referring to us as half, quarter,…step, things like that,’ he says, displeased even by the taste of those words. ‘I think that’s like weights and measures. This didn’t even occur to us until he became president, until he gained prominence. And now we’re sort of like celebrities.’”

“‘But this is a streak of ignorance,’ he adds. ‘Here in Africa we don’t think of each other as ‘half’ this or that. In an extended family, someone is your brother even if he is just in your clan. So I…am Obama.’”

This should lay to rest why Barack Obama has spent 5 ½ years destroying America’s relationship with Israel and at the same time has been courting all of the Islamic nations that have vowed to destroy Israel.

Hamas clearly started the current conflict by kidnapping and killing three Israeli teenage boys. After Israel retaliated, Hamas began rocketing Israel which is what prompted Israel to start rocketing Hamas targets in the Gaza Strip. Hamas and the Palestinian extremists clearly started the conflict yet Barack Obama has joined the anti-Israeli liberal media in condemning Israel for what’s happening.

With a brother who’s working with, for and supporting anti-Semitic and anti-American terrorists, it explains why Obama has been so dead set on destroying Israel and the United States.

Posted in Connect the dots, Keep the "Change" | Leave a comment

Eleanor Holmes Norton: “You don’t have a Right to know whats going on at the White House” or What happens when Ignorant Idiots elect one of their own!

July 27, 2014

Eleanor Holmes Norton: ‘You don’t have a right to know’ what’s going on at the White House

By Rick Moran

Rep. Elanor Holmes Norton, Washington, D.C.’s non voting delegate to Congress, has a novel definition of the separation of powers. Becoming exasperated at House Oversight Committee Chairman Darrell Issa’s insistence that a subpoena to David Simas, director of the administration’s Office of Political Strategy, should go forward, Holmes Norton dressed down Issa by claiming the Oversight Committee, which oversees the executive branch, didn’t have the right to investigate the White House.

Washington Examiner:

“You don’t have a right to know everything in a separation-of-powers government, my friend. That is the difference between a parliamentary government and a separation-of-powers government,” Norton said during a House Oversight and Government Reform Committee hearing.

It was, to put mildly, a significant departure from the more traditional liberal stance that openness and transparency are must to prevent abuses of power by government officials. Instead the leading advocate for statehood for the District of Columbia literally argued that even the congressional committee charged with oversight shouldn’t be asking questions in the first place.

She made the comments while protesting the committee’s Republican majority for voting to ignore a claim by the White House that David Simas, director of it’s Office of Political Strategy and Outreach, was immune to a congressional subpoena to testify. Republicans believe the office is being used a political campaign operation, a violation of federal election law.

Chairman Darrell Issa, R-Calif., noted he was not alleging any wrongdoing by Simas, but there was a history of violations involving that particular office in prior administrations that justified requesting his testimony.

Under President Obama, the White House has asserted sweeping executive powers, including the right to ignore pretty much all congressional inquiries. The administration has regularly ignored subpoenas from congressional committees.

Holmes was clearly down with that. She called Issa’s subpoena a “showcase fishing expedition.” She went on to argue that the Constitution’s separation of powers specifically gives the people who work directly under the chief executive immunity from subpoenas. “The president’s immediate advisor is not an agency and this is not a matter of policy,” she said, before going to further clarify that we “don’t have a right to know” everything that the administration does.

Obviously, Holmes Norton is ignorant of the Constitution as well as the dozen or so Supreme Court rulings that have given Congress wide latitude to investigate the executive branch.

The Legal Information Institute makes Holmes-Norton look like the idiot she is:

The Court has long since accorded its agreement with Congress that the investigatory power is so essential to the legislative function as to be implied from the general vesting of legislative power in Congress. “We are of the opinion,” wrote Justice Van Devanter, for a unanimous Court, “that the power of inquiry—with process to enforce it—is an essential and appropriate auxiliary to the legislative function. . . . A legislative body cannot legislate wisely or effectively in the absence of information respecting the conditions which the legislation is intended to affect or change; and where the legislative body does not itself possess the requisite information— which not infrequently is true—recourse must be had to others who possess it. Experience has taught that mere requests for such information often are unavailing, and also that information which is volunteered is not always accurate or complete; so some means of compulsion are essential to obtain what is needed. All this was true before and when the Constitution was framed and adopted. In that period the power of inquiry—with enforcing process—was regarded and employed as a necessary and appropriate attribute of the power to legislate— indeed, was treated as inhering in it. Thus there is ample warrant for thinking, as we do, that the constitutional provisions which commit the legislative function to the two houses are intended to include this attribute to the end that the function may be effectively exercised.”163

It is any wonder that we have a government that is unable and unwilling to follow the simple precepts of the Constitution? Ignorance is no excuse, but in Holmes Norton and most liberal’s cases, the Constitution is seen as an impediment – something to be overcome not followed.

Does Constitutional Law Professor Obama feel the same way? He’s acting as if he does.

Posted in For YOUR consideration, Keep the "Change" | Leave a comment

We didn’t THEN and we won’t NOW! MOLON LABE!


Posted in 2nd Amendment, Hit & Run | Leave a comment

A Storm is coming America…..a “hard rain”…..WILL fall~

A Storm is coming and a hard rain will fall

A Storm is coming and a hard rain will fall

Posted in Hit & Run | Leave a comment

Islam, the “Religion of Piece” Beheads 50….YOU better Ammo Up America or it’ll be YOUR head on the stake next…………..

Islamic State Beheads 50 – Puts Their Heads On Poles in Public

Pamela Geller

As much as I despise running this “jihad porn,” people must know what it is we are dealing with. Beheading is Islamic ritual slaughter.

High lite link below, then right click and select “Open Link”….WARNING GRAPHIC!

Obama was warned of this group well over a year ago. He told David Remick of the New Yorker that they were the JV team against the LA Lakers. Well, the JV team has taken over whole swaths of Syria (the Levant) and Iraq, and they have stated more than once that they are coming for Obama.

The enemedia dishonestly downplays the threat of jihad — just as they describe the violent pro-terror riots across the world as “clashes.”

They are dishonest and dangerous.

This video might be too gruesome or graphic, but in a campaign against Islamic barbarism and savagery, people must know.

Yesterday I published a news story about an Australian Muslim who went to Syria and was photographed proudly posing with five decapitated heads. A Western Muslim — no poverty, no illiteracy, no cultural misunderstanding. An Australian Muslim. The common thread? Islam.

It’s coming to us …..

50 Soldiers Beheaded And Their Heads Put On Poles,” Liveleak (thanks to George)

50 soldier’s of Syria’s 417 Division were beheaded and their heads put on poles.

Jihadists from the Islamic State group have killed at least 50 Syrian soldiers in an ambush, summarily executing most of them after their capture, a monitoring group says.

The assault in Raqa province, the jihadists’ Euphrates valley stronghold, came amid their fiercest assault yet on Damascus-held territory.

The deaths added to 74 already killed in the offensive across the north and northeast, the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights said on Friday (local time).

“At least 50 soldiers were ambushed, some of them were killed in fighting but most of them were beheaded,” Observatory director Rami Abdel Rahman said.

IS militants claimed the toll was as high as 75.


Pamela Geller’s commitment to freedom from jihad and Sharia shines forth in her books

Don’t forget to Like Freedom Outpost on Facebook, Google Plus, Tea Party Community & Twitter.

You can also get Freedom Outpost delivered to your Amazon Kindle device here.


Posted in For YOUR consideration | Leave a comment

Did you ever notice how flies are ALWAYS drawn to shit?


Posted in Hit & Run | Leave a comment

Congresswoman Carolyn Maloney D-N.Y. sees “threat” in the Constitution’s 2nd Amendment……………these Liberal Bastards Need to GO!

Congresswoman sees ‘threat’ in Constitution


But House sergeant-at-arms says gun expert’s
comment presented ‘no specific danger’

Bob Unruh

The head of a gun-rights organization is delivering a lesson on the Constitution to a member of Congress who claimed his statements on the Second Amendment constituted a threat against her.

“Allow me to explain the obvious,” Larry Pratt, executive director of Gun Owners of America, wrote in an open letter to Rep. Carolyn Maloney, D-N.Y.

“I have never encouraged, or even suggested, that anyone harm anyone. Rather, my speech was designed to educate citizens, and politicians, that it is the fact that Americans are armed that allows them to resist efforts to be dominated, intimidated, or controlled by politicians.”

His letter came after Maloney reported him to Capitol Police and the House Sergeant-at-Arms because of his statements in a recent interview with Rolling Stone.

In the interview, she alleged, “Mr. Pratt is actively encouraging his members to threaten violent action against members of Congress.”

Roll Call reported Maloney claimed Pratt’s statements were evidence of “just how outrageous the extreme pro-gun movement has become.”

The report said: “Maloney’s staff notified Capitol Police and House Sergeant-at-Arms Paul Irving of the recent article which declared Pratt the ‘Gun Lobby’s Secret Weapon,’ the congresswoman said, but they were told there was ‘no specific danger and nothing to be done.’”

Pratt told the congresswoman: “Lest you believe that I stand on the fringes of civilized society, let me provide you with some other sources for the same principle which I was enunciating.”

He cited the Declaration of Independence, which states “whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government.”

He quoted Frederick Douglass: “A man’s rights rest in three boxes: the ballot box, the jury box, and the cartridge box.”

Get Larry Pratt’s collection of columns and articles on gun control, in “On the Firing Line: Essays in the Defense of Liberty.”

And he called on the wisdom of John Basil Barnhill: “Where the people fear the government you have tyranny. Where the government fears the people you have liberty.”

Finally, he quoted Justice Antonin Scalia: “[W]hen the able-bodied men of a nation are trained in arms and organized, they are better able to resist tyranny.”

“These various statements span four centuries. They come from people of differing ethnicities, of various stations, and holding differing political beliefs,” Pratt wrote. “What they all agree on is that you should go to work every day with a healthy amount of fear and respect for the American people who you are supposed to represent.”

In Rolling Stone, Pratt had said, “The Second Amendment is not for hunting, it’s not even for self-defense.” Instead, it is “for restraining tyrannical tendencies in government. … Especially those in the liberal, tyrannical end of the spectrum. There is some restraint, and even if the voters of Brooklyn don’t hold them back, it may be there are other ways that their impulses are somewhat restrained. That’s the whole idea of the Second Amendment.”

The New York Daily News interpreted the statement to mean Pratt believes “the Second Amendment exists to ensure government officials face a permanent threat of gun violence.”

Not so, Pratt insisted.

Congress should do its job, he said, “in constant trepidation” over concern the members’ job performance would be “publicly criticized from the soap box … you will be voted out via the ballot box” or there would be a verdict in the jury box.

And, he wrote, “Should you attempt to disarm Americans the way the British crown tried 240 years ago, the same sovereign people who constituted this government using the cartridge box someday may need to reconstitute it, as clearly anticipated by the Declaration of Independence.”

A WND call requesting comment from Maloney’s office was not returned. But thousands of other Americans did jump into the conversation.

Examiner author David Codrea wrote that, like the famous “I’m Spartacus” scene from the Kubrick movie, on this issue he would say, “I’m Larry Pratt.”

“If the Capitol Police are going to investigate him, they’re going to have to investigate me, too, because I agree with everything he said about the Second Amendment being a last-resort protection against tyranny,” he wrote.

Thousands of Americans joined in with his statement on GOA’s Facebook page.

The basic constitutional concept also got an endorsement from GOP superstar Dr. Ben Carson, the retired neurosurgeon and author of multiple bestsellers.

According to, at a recent Western Conservative Summit in Colorado, Carson said the Second Amendment was installed in the Constitution so Americans could support the military if needed, but “more importantly, so that people could protect themselves from an overly aggressive government, if that ever happened.”

He said he “would never compromise the Second Amendment in any way.”

“All we have to do is look back through history and see what happened when various dictators rose to power,” he said. “One of the first things they always did was confiscate the weapons. So we don’t ever want to allow that situation to occur.

“We don’t even necessarily want them to know who has weapons.” he said.

Pratt told the congresswoman: “The Second Amendment was written to preserve ‘a free state’ against the ever present temptation faced by government officials to steal liberty from the people.”

And he re-told the story of Athens, Tennessee, in post-World War II 1946, when returning veterans “found their hometown …. had been taken over by corrupt local politicians.”

“It was those veterans’ access to and experience with firearms that made possible the preservation of ballot boxes that were about to be fraudulently counted, in what has come to be known as the Battle of Athens. A 1992 movie entitled ‘An American Story’ commemorates the actions of these brave veterans,” he wrote.

“Private ownership and skilled use of firearms is what enabled our country to gain its independence, and it is what continues to preserve our liberty. Someday, I hope that you study this aspect of the history of our great nation, that currently allows you to serve in the People’s House, and come to understand the great principles on which it was founded and continues to operate,” Pratt wrote.

Posted in 2nd Amendment | Leave a comment